Main

October 01, 2009

Domestic Stocks: October Outlook

By Matthew Storey

Ah, October. 4th Quarter drama.

The Stock Market roars into Fall after two successive winning Quarters, opening to October trading with the same mixture of uncertainty it has climbed since March. Jobs continue to be shed, spending remains slight, congress is hurtling towards nowhere, the Supreme Court session and first post-Obama election loom in a tinder-box electorate...stocks were cheap. Now? They are not.

Any climb loses momentum as the weight of stock prices increases and the wind of low valuations stops blowing.

The market was oversold - on legitimate pessimism.

Sources of optimism like the new President, an adroit stimulus reassurance in the critical first two months and the availability of economic bedrock companies with stock prices battered by circumstances irrelevant to them offered a natural recovery.

But...

That has occurred. The DOW is littered with fatty, high Price/Earnings, Price/Book Value behemoths who've had nice runs on the rebound. The natural flight to quality that occurs when Blue Chips can be had for penny stock prices is a self-fulfilling one. When Markets move from undervalued to fairly valued, the party stops floating all boats and becomes about price. In such markets, like this one - slow growth, stimulus supported, bounceback - the expensive stocks are the ones that get whacked.

Throw in the lurking One Hump Camel (Drama Day) and October is a time to get safe and wait for the fun. The political theatre behind Health Care, the 'Rogue', regulation and tea-party freakdom creates a little storm of opportunity to wreak a little October Market Havoc. 3rd Quarters often coast home on the fumes of early year run-ups and when those high valuation stocks meet October.

Well, you know.

Market players align with the rabble rousers and want to protect their tax rates, their regulatory free reign, their '09 profits/bonuses AND their underlying economy. The best way to do that, with 3Q money in the bank and three months until December fattening, is to have a little pre-election blowup - make political hay and then savor a nice run-up to the year end. Something about a cake you can gobble up.

A Day of Drama (or half-week) almost certainly lurks and, just as certainly, has no real world implications. Get lean, watch the show, then pick up the better priced opportunities.

October planning:

* Prune your winners and sell those with high Price/Earnings valuations. Take PROFIT.
* Grab at Blue Chip Value.
* Give away your Yield, that haul has been mined.
* BUY long-term strategic plays in infrastructure, new energy, transportation...
* SELL your US Dollar and hold something like a 48/32/20 ratio of Yen/Euro/Dollar in cash accounts.
* OWN Brazil, China, Spain, Canada stocks.

Some things to think on during October.

Here are some Stocks that you should BUY and some others that you should SELL.


BUY

General Electric GE/NYSE $16.42 12.2PE/2.39%Y

The rule? when GE is cheap on a valuation basis - you buy it. Very good, Birdies.
There are a thousand horror stories about American industrials who once stood astride the globe and now have outdated products with out of control ad budgets and out of touch executives. GE was a powerhouse, will be an even bigger powerhouse and gets things right, across the board. The turbines, propulsion systems, environmental engineering equipment that will become societal imperatives and market drivers, will largely be made by GE. At these levels, the stock would be a BUY, even if that one slice of GE's business wasn't factored in.


BUY

American SuperConductor Corporation AMSC/NASDAQ $33.54 NMPE

AMSC is another perfectly positioned player for 2010 onward, they will see infrastructure expenditures in their balance sheets and have the right product/services mix.


BUY

International Business Machines IBM/NYSE $119.50 12.8PE

Plug in the basic sentiments of the GE comment line and it applies here. IBM was a computer leader, IBM IS a computer leader. They moved to services, took a hit, made it work, got better and better and can be had cheap. You can buy GE and IBM at these levels and take that multi-year retreat you've dreamed of. When you get back, you'll have a pile.

SELL

Wynn Resorts WYNN/NASDAQ $70.89

This puppy barked its way from $20 per share in March up above $70 today. It holds the definitive profile for an October wipeout.

SELL

Dupont Chemicals DD/NYSE $32.64 and Dow Chemicals DOW/NYSE $26.18

The Chemicals have been major portfolio staples in the Blue Penguin Fund since we began buying last October. But those April shares of Dupont at 16 have doubled and the 10 dollar Dow is 25. Both are overpriced and will be trimmed here and the Yield can be improved on the pullback. Let them take the October/November haircut and we shall see about the year end.

April 14, 2009

Question of the Week - April 15th; Delving Deeper!

Alright Guru, last week you sated my desire for a triple-stack. I set up a spreadsheet myself to understand the expenditures and risks that were taken on Apple equity and options, and am grateful for your guidance. There's a chance in the not so distant future that I'll set up a hypothetical options trading strategy to see how I do without actually risking any money.

In the prior week, we discussed 3 factors related to the macro-analysis of equities: 1) political environment, 2) macro-economic environment, 3) relationship of a given company to the global economic future.

Let's take our analysis a step further so I can start picking companies myself: Can you give me some company-specific pointers that I should be looking at? Also, what aspects of a stock's past performance do you find useful, if any, to better understand what kinds of risks you are about to take?

********************************************************************************************************
Thanks, Steve!

As we've discussed previously, stock-picking requires acumen and data.

Every investor has certain strengths and those should be exploited fully - in your case, as a scientist, you do an excellent job of breaking down technology and extrapolating its potential usages. That is why you have the role you have here at VagabondGuru.com. You have a broad, scientific education and an easy facility with materials and mathematics. This is your acumen.

If you expose yourself to material (data) relating to your processing strengths, your brain will continue to provide better and better answers and automatically draw connections between various data streams, without being induced to do so. If you repeat the data exposure over time, the neural pathways and habits will form, unbidden, that will allow you to replicate these processes.

I gave you the example of Annie Oakley, the sharpshooter and 19th Century Celebrity whose uncanny ability to pinpoint moving objects and shoot them out of mid-air evidenced an intrinsic geometric capability that might never have been augmented by a Geometry textbook, AND a seamless interaction between her spacial calculations and her physical reflexes. Had her mind been pointed towards mathematics or physics, she may have been able to process great understandings.

She had the acumen for precision shooting.

And.

She practiced.

Mark Teixeira, 1B on the New York Yankees made a spectacular play on a sharply hit ground ball to his right the other day. The ball was hit like a laser by Victor Martinez, hitting LH, a powerful hitter who generates incredible torque on a baseball. Teixeira, moved towards the ball in an instant, and turned his body, so that the glove on his left hand would be positioned to receive the ball. In the last bounce on the ground before he was going to have a chance to catch this ball, traveling at a high rate of speed, with his body twisted away from his line of sight, the ball took a 'bad hop' (might have hit a pebble...) and altered its trajectory upwards. Teixeira shot his glove along the plane of the ball and snared it with his eyes facing away from the ball, rolling his glove over his shoulder in the process to absorb the impact AND position him to run to the base to complete the play.

Elapsed time? A fraction of a second.

He has the acumen, and he's fielded thousands upon thousands of baseballs.

This then, is my short-term, non-answer.

We will continue to explore valuation tools, not in concert but piecemeal, and you will build your data-points upon an axis of your own construction, secure in the understanding that the way your mind processes data is distinct from mine. I will show you the tools that guide me, book-value, earnings-per-share, price-earnings-ratio, balance sheet analysis, technical indicators, understanding the company executive and add those company-specific data points to those macro-economic elements we began with, and the stocks will begin to sort themselves out for you.

The Market is not scientific, the human elements and hidden data will always factor into our equation in ways that cannot be accounted for. Like a 'bad hop'.

But, if you take the time and do the work and grok it completely. You'll roll with these elements, grab the ball and be running directly towards the base without even remembering the process that led you there.






April 08, 2009

Question of the Week - Stock Options - Equities

Alright Guru, you gave a great answer last week - now I know where I need to look first (political environment, macro-economic situation and the future with respect to any given investment). Let's incorporate time into the mixture though. I know that stock option prices (a/k/a option contracts) are based on a given stock's price at a given time. In terms of the securities you look at, how are you playing the options market on those securities? How are you making money buying and selling options?

Thanks, Steve!

First off, its important to understand what Options ARE and what they are not. The derivatives market has metastasized and destabilized much of the world's financial system and options ARE derivatives.

A derivative is a financial instrument that 'derives' from another financial instrument.

The damage has been wrought by derivatives that derive from Mortgages that have been bundled, sold, and re-sold (MBS - Mortgage Backed Securities) and debt that has been bundled (CDO - Collateralized Debt Obligations). That is NOT the sort of instrument you are referring to and NOT the kind of investable security that any investor should consider, unless you are looking for an ENORMOUS write-off for your portfolio.

The derivatives we ARE interested in are 'Equity Options', which derive from common Stocks.

An Option contract is the right to BUY ('Call') or SELL ('Put'), 100 shares of a particular Stock, at a particular price ('Strike Price'), over a defined period of time.

The Price of the option has two components, the first is 'Intrinsic Value', which denotes the actual price above the 'Strike Price' the stock is trading for at the time of purchase. The second component, is the 'Time Value', which is an imprecise measure based upon market forces (supply and demand) that is loosely related to how much time remains until the Option Contract expires. Options are deteriorating assets that lose 'Time Value' with each market day and expire worthless if not sold for market price or if held to closing date at a value below (call) or above (put) the Strike Price.

For Guru, and other market professionals, the allure of Options is their versatility and affordability, this is PARTICULARLY true in markets like the current one, where conditions are treacherous and an investor wants to limit their downside exposure.

An Equity Option has a separate Ticker Symbol from it's underlying security, as it is, literally - a separate security. It derives its value from the Stock, but trades independently of that Stock, and trades a FRACTION of the volume. For this reason, with lesser liquidity, the market for Options is less efficient than for Stocks. To the Professional, this means a greater chance of finding an 'Arbitrage', a gap in the pricing between similar securities trading on different exchanges or in the pricing itself (Guru will write about Arbitrage again and again, it is a critical concept to understand in all arenas).

Option Symbols are comprised of five letters, the first three are that Stocks 'Option String' the three letters associated with Options for that Security. The fourth letter is the Expiration month for the option (Options expire on the 3rd Friday of every month, known, not surprisingly as 'Option Expiration Day'!). The year has been broken down by letter, so A - L equate to January - December for Calls, and M-X equate to January - December for Puts. The fifth letter equates to the Strike Price, with letter values assigned for prices ending from 5/105/205/305 (A) and ascending in 5 dollar increments up to 100/200/300/400 (T), and (U) -( Z) are used for smaller increments of 2.5 dollar increments.

For EXAMPLE (since understanding the previous paragraph can be dicey!).

Apple Computer has an option string with a Base Symbol of 'APV'.

The Stock, AAPL, closed yesterday (WEDS) at $116.32 per share.

An Investor, named 'Guru' is interested in buying Options on Apple shares, because he does not wish to tie up cash in outright purchases of the stock (100 shares would cost $11,632). Purchasing Option contracts allows me to use 'Leverage' and control lots of 100 shares each, potentially benefiting from price movements in the interim and locking in my purchase price at the same time.

I will select a 'strike price' that appears reasonable, in the case of Apple, a stock that has moved from under $80 per share in late January to $116 in early April (a 45% gain), 'reasonable' is just about anything - either a continuance of those spectacular gains, or a retracement - back towards $80.

EXACTLY the reason I'd prefer to use Options when dealing with a stock like Apple.

For our example, I have chosen a strike price of $125 per share, an upward move of $9.

What I would typically do is look to build a 'Stack' (a Bodybuilding term) of Options at that strike price, with different expiration dates. This means I am relatively certain the stock will move towards that price, but not sure WHEN. In other examples, I might look to purchase a 'Homey String' (these are both proprietary terms, so you won't get anything but a quizzy look if you use them...) which means I buy various options at DIFFERENT strike prices, usually in the same expiration month - that would indicate I am relatively certain the stock is moving up and want to dabble in various levels.

For Apple, then, I'd look to build my Stack as follows:

* Buy 100 APVDE (APV is Apple Option/D is April Expiration/E is 125 strike price) at .44 (x 100 shares) for a purchase price of $44.00 per contract. These are contracts that expire in 7 trading days (TH/FR/M/T/W/TH/F) - such contracts are known as 'Suicides', for obvious reasons, because you are almost certain to 'DIE'! (have them expire worthless). The extremely inexpensive cost and the reality of the underlying Stock's recent strength, make it worth the risk, since even a move TOWARDS the Strike Price can result in high profits of 100 or 200 percent in a matter of days. High Risk/High Reward is the tip of the Stack.

100 contracts (44.00) = $4,400.00 Purchase

* Buy 20 APVEE (May 125's) at 4.00, or $400 per contract.

20 Contracts (400) = $8,000.00 Purchase

* Buy 10 APVGE (July 125's) at 8.00, or $800 per contract.

10 Contracts (800) = $8,000.00 Purchase

* Buy 5 APVJE (October 125's) at 12.40, or $1,240 per contract.

5 Contracts (1,240) = $6,200.00 Purchase

So, now I've identified 125 as my Strike Price for Apple Computer and built a Stack that captures that movement in four different expiring months, at four different price points.

Then I may decide to make it a 'Double Stack' (also used by 'Wendy's'!) and purchase a LEAP (Long Term Equity Anticipation) contract, which expires in January of the following YEAR and has it's own Ticker Symbol.

* Buy 10 LEAP Contracts/ WAAAE (January '10 125's) at 15.90, or $1,590 per contract.

10 contracts (1,590) = $15,900.00 Purchase

And, if I am really hungry for Apple, let's go ahead and make it a 'Triple Stack' and purchase LEAPS that expire the FOLLOWING January (2011).

* Buy 10 LEAP Contracts/ VAAAE (January '11 125's) at 26.30, or $2,630 per contract.

10 contracts (2,630) = $26,300.00 Purchase.

What have I done?

I have assured myself of the right to buy Apple shares, in lots of 100, at differing expiration dates for the price of $125 per share. I know, going forward, that I can own shares at that price and I believe the price will move upwards, so I believe I will be able to sell some contracts for profit and use that profit to exercise on the other contracts, thus using the Option outlay to pay for Stock AND make profit.

I have risked a total of $68,800 (there are transaction costs involved, but they are nominal) to make this investment, and, if I have miscalculated, I risk that entire investment.

On the other hand, I have built a Triple Stack, which provides me with about 20 months time to realize my gains, and believe the stock will move above the Strike Price at SOME point in that period.

The same $68,800 would have allowed me to purchase 591 shares of Apple computer, OUTRIGHT, but with the shares in hand, a $9 gain in price would only result in (591 x 9) in a gain of $5,319. Not worth it in such a volatile market, in this case, the volatility works FOR me and my investment need only return MORE than $5,319 to be successful.

We will track this Triple Stack and follow the results.

Hopefully, this has expanded your understanding of Option investments and answered your question of the week!

March 31, 2009

Question of the Week

By Red Sox Steve and Matthew

Steve: International Global Marketplace: Please describe the three most important factors that will influence your decision to purchase or sell any non-US equity during the 2nd quarter of 2009. You have the option of including or excluding a discussion of the purchase and sale of stock options in your answer.

Guru: Thanks for asking!

I've been investing Internationally for about 26 years and have boiled the process down quite a bit, the important thing to remember is the PROCESS should not be impacted by a particular timeline (2nd Quarter of 2009) - it must remain uniform.

It is the DATA that changes.

If you follow the process and assess the current data, you should be able to avoid bad mistakes and place your investments in solid position, regardless of the underlying climate. And, if an investment DOES turn against you for reasons outside of the scope of your research, don't waste energy on recriminations - run your models with the NEW information and make a determination, if they say 'SELL' - do so, and move on.


Three Steps to take before buying Non-US Equities

1.) The FIRST thing you must do is assess the POLITICAL climate.

The security you are considering is based in a country and lists its securities in that country or another, you need to get a sense of the political climate in both places, if they are different.

There are plenty of good companies with solid securities that operate in countries where the marketplace infrastructure and regulatory environment are not sufficiently transparent and effective enough to insure safety of transaction and certainty of reporting. Investments should never be contemplated in such environments, it will make little difference to your portfolio to find yourself correct about a particular company's prospects, only to see its profits flowing to Government officials, Company executives or gangsters.

Examples can be found anywhere in the World.

In Russia, where a thriving equity market was beginning to take hold, three events have undermined all confidence and made the country radioactive for new foreign investment;

A.) The Invasion of Georgia.

This action, taken during the height of Oil Prices, at the dawn of the Beijing Olympics signaled to the world that Russia had an aggressive posture towards its neighbors/customers, based upon Nationalistic concerns that would likely trump commercial ones. That is a negative for equity investors, who want solid footing and an absence of 'off-the-balance-sheet' risks. Sudden invasions of other countries are WAY off the balance sheet and inject inherent instability into the Russian equity equation, instability is the enemy of equity investors.

B.) The Fleecing of British Petroleum.

BP engaged, on its own behalf, and with the specific encouragement of Vladimir Putin, in a series of lease and development deals with Gazprom and in TNK partnerships with Russian Oil Oligarchs. As soon as the BP investment had been made and the development of fields begun, the Russian government moved to restructure BP's stake arbitrarily and the eventual fiasco found BP trading assets in other regions in order to extricate itself from the deals gone bad. The result is a 20B+ hole in BP's balance sheet, borne by its investors, and a chilling impact on additional foreign investment in Russia's Oil & Gas industry. The same situation has been occurring regularly in Venezuela.

3.) The Plummet in the Price of Oil.

Just as Russia restructured its entire economy around maximum exploitation of its Oil and Gas reserves and built its expansionist budget around extrapolations of Oil and Gas revenues from historic high levels, the Global economy imploded and the demand model of consumption evaporated, taking Oil down by $100 a barrel, decimating the Russian economy, stock market and currency and leaving a badly wounded Russian bear trapped into a corner of its own making.

NOT a place to invest.

In China, which, as the global engine of the Planet, home to more graduating engineers and scientists, higher savings rates and possessing a stable government with demonstrated economic foresight would appear to be an IDEAL place to invest. But it is not that simple.

Chinese equity markets are labyrinthine and subject to the autocratic designs of the ruling party, those are not risks that can easily be borne by individual investors of ANY means. Still, you need to be invested in Chinese equities - so you should look to Taiwanese or Japanese companies that do extensive business with the Chinese but are not subject to Mainland secrecy or oversight, or invest in ADR (American Depository Receipts) where you have the more comprehensive reporting requirements and transparency while still holding a piece of Chinese industry. The rewards may be more modest but the risks are all but eliminated, making it a stronger overall investment, particularly in this climate of peril.

2.) The SECOND thing you must assess is the MACRO-ECONOMIC climate.

Every country operates in both a domestic climate and an international one. The situation in any particular country or company is likely to be materially impacted by the state of both and Investors must understand that environment before plunging. You not only need to know the political character of elected officials, but their economic stance and how that positions them relative to the rest of the world. You must assess how the particular industry you are interested in will function relative to those plans...Dubya in the US meant positive things for Oil & Gas, Defense, Commodity based businesses, Extraction industries and a de-regulated climate for Banks and Insurers, but was poor for knowledge-based industries, commercial technology, domestic infrastructure...Obama flips those priorities 180 degrees and investors have to understand that.

Globally, an investor must remain conversant with developments broadly and with countries where investment if contemplated, specifically. In the 2nd Quarter of 2009, it is critical to understand which countries are positively disposed towards the Stimulus infusions and which are opposed, as this will impact on domestic industry and its ability to engage in trade. At the current G20 summit, we are seeing that Conservative German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, stranded politically by the socialist designs, has staked out ground in opposition to the stimulus just as UK Prime Minister, Gordon Brown is declaring a 'Global New Deal' and Japanese Prime Minister, Taro Ase is ridiculing her position as being shortsighted and immature. These differences have real-world implications that you must measure if dealing with one of these countries equities. Regardless of how you feel PERSONALLY, it is important to assess events and trends on what IS, not what you WISH it to be.

Don't play philosophy with Money - observe, deduce, react. Have a solid understanding of local matters of foreign investment, taxation and trade policy BEFORE you invest.

3.) The THIRD consideration applies to ANY contemplated equity investment, particularly in the current climate.

You must assess the relationship of the particular company to the global economic FUTURE, not its past.

Certain industries (Oil & Gas, Automotive, Banking, Insurance) have suffered seismic shocks and have altered in fundamental and permanent fashion. You need to be able to make a case for a particular situation being able to swim against those tides before investing in these industries.

Other industries (clean energy, new transportation modalities, biotechnology, environmental engineering, infrastructure construction, space, robotics) are the beneficiaries of broad governmental focus and expenditure and are likely to be supplemented by huge subsidies to their underlying educational feeder pools, thus identifying them not only as 'Hot' areas for investment but sustainable ones. However, many of these companies either do not yet exist in investable form or do not yet have profitability that will grow them in the near term, you must assess the likely timeline, tweak it regularly and compare it with your own investment/risk objectives.

It's 2009, purchase equities in those businesses that make SENSE for the 21st Century and avoid those that no longer do or have short time horizons looking forward - investment is a FORWARD-looking enterprise, your assessments must not be guided by past dynamics.








February 01, 2009

America's Economy in 2009: Out of the Vacuum

As I sit here in the Aerie, writing this piece here on Super Bowl Sunday, there are several momentous economic events from which to choose as the basis of this week's Sunday commentary.

So many are these, and of such critical nature, in fact, that to choose ONE would, by definition, actually serve to obscure the larger picture.

That would defeat the purpose of the Blue Penguin Report.

Accordingly, I am going to draw our lens up to the 60,000 foot level and take an overview of the entire Global situation here on February 1, 2009 and identify the themes and situations that we will be talking about for the rest of the year - some 335 Blue Penguin Reports - plenty of time to go in-depth on the particulars of each one.

The United States is reeling.

There is no dispute about that. Unemployment appears to be heading to 10%. The US Dollar, manipulated to a position of weakness by the Bush administration in the early part of the decade (a misguided attempt to boost manufacturing and trade through favorable currency exchange), has fallen down flat on its face (sorry, George Washington!) due to the almost surrealistic deficit that administration ran up. The current interest rate climate (near zero) and stimulus packages, when added to the war expenses, metastasizing foreclosures, job/benefit losses insure that, for the foreseeable future, the Dollar will be structurally weak against the Euro and the Yen.

The Obama administration, in its first days, has wisely focused on longer term economic fixes that are literally, the only 'Hope' the 'Yes We Can' guy can provide us - but these changes insure pain for wide swaths of our industrial base. Insurance companies, Banks, Investment firms, agriculture, for profit-medical companies, pharmaceuticals, bio-techs, forestry, oil & gas, defense, automotive...all of these businesses are going to be dramatically restructured in the coming years. None of us can reliably predict how those changes will impact on the NEAR term - and none of us can afford to focus on that, as the situation dictates dramatic change that will help us to GET to the mid-term with a competitive chance...

And a clue.

Because, the neo-feudal model of the Bush years?

That's D-O-N-E.

The 'Fossil-Fuels and Combustion-Engines Forever' duopoly?

On it's way OUT.

Companies that have avoided innovation, and chosen to plow their burgeoning profits into labor battles and political advocacy are now in line to reap what they have sewn. And that is a whirlwind.

The upshot of these disturbing elements is, as the Obama campaign promised - change.

Change, that in this case, is overdue, well needed and jarring. Tens of millions of Americans are going to discover that not only has their situation deteriorated in the past eighteen months, but it is likely that the lifestyle they knew or aspired to previously, will never again be in their grasp. That is sobering, but it also reality. In fact, as we discuss here in the coming months and years, the conversion of the United States economy from a hybrid 19th Century (commodities, agriculture, extraction industries)/20th Century (insurance, advertising, processed foods) model into a 21st Century version (green, digital, knowledge based, space, robotics, cybernetics, bioengineering, space...) is the single most important task this generation will face, and, like its Depression era forebears, there is every reason to believe this generation will do so while fighting much of the rest of the world Militarily.

That is daunting stuff.

And what is worse? ('How can anything be worse, Guru?) The Obama administration will be trying to right this enormous ship, amidst roiling seas, with at least half of it's citizenry pulling in the opposite direction. As Machiavelli noted in that too-often-quoted-by-Guru line, those who have benefited from the 'old' ways will be pulling to return to them or reinforce them, at the expense of change. The changes that are coming, in the stimulus bill and in the Global arena, will permanently alter the basis of 'The American Dream' for tens of millions of Americans who have no CONCEPTION of such a thing.

For these Americans, many of them already reeling from a country that looks very different from the one they thought they were voting for with a succession of GOP Presidents who promised them their biases would hold sway in the World - their illusion of central position is ALL THEY HAVE LEFT. It is that VERY illusion that kept Detroit from dramatically transforming the automobile after the Japanese influx and oil-embargo's of the 1970's, that kept Blue Collar workers from pushing their children towards new arenas and scholarship despite the near-uninterrupted decline in their relevance and circumstance over the past thirty years - dooming the kids to the fate of the fathers - now all threatened together.

What those companies have discovered - that competition does not wait for Y-O-U and those workers have learned - that not only isn't mommy staying home, daddy making a big-time income that will easily support a single family home, two car garage, new car every other year (the '50s 'dream' that Reagan sold in the '80s, already gone before he was elected) but those elements - a single family home, an automobile (let alone two), a decent paying job, a relationship - are all subject to new realities that render them not only less desirable, but less affordable and even, less POSSIBLE.

And they aren't the only ones in for a shock to add to the shock they have already endured. Those who HAVE looked to scholarship for a leg-up and believed that making it INTO the hallowed halls of white-collar life - Medicine, Law, Investment Banking...guaranteed one a certain lifestyle are now discovering the same thing those auto-workers realized - there ARE no more guarantees.

What happened?

The post WW II economy was built upon several unsustainable factors that allowed a country of a couple of hundred million people to bestride a world of BILLIONS.

A Europe and Japan in ruins took a generation to rebuild.

A Russia beholden to ideology took a generation to implode.

A China only one generation removed from rice paddies and agricultural life took another generation to embrace technology and educational reforms.

A Latin-America in the grips of Dictators, Death-Squads, Catholicism and Oligarchs has taken two generations to move towards modernity.

An India beholden to colonial England took two generations to remove the Brits, split off from Islamic Fundamentalists and embrace modernity.

An Islam battered by two world wars, broken off from the Ottoman empire, colonized, granted independence...has been lifted by the commodity rush for its oil but held down by its faith and rejection of modernity - creating a hybrid of modern technology and ancient ideology that threatens to bring the entire planet under in favor of those who 'crave death as much as you cherish life'.

An America not yet sufficiently threatened by environmental degradation to account for the damage and not yet sufficiently 'free' to offer equal opportunity for the pursuit of 'life, liberty' and 'Happiness' that are its creed, to its Blacks, its women, its Gays or those who answered its call for the 'tired, poor, huddled masses yearning to be free'. They all yearned, they are all now free, to some extent that will only increase.

So what to do?

Scientists perform experiments in vacuum conditions to understand how forces respond in ideal conditions - ie: conditions that are favorable to the results the Scientist is seeking. The highly conditional Global circumstances of the past sixty years WERE a vacuum.

THAT was the 'bubble' that has burst on America. A Vacuum condition in which, only America was whole and in-place to drive global growth and set global priorities. The changes, which we've listed in only a broad, simple fashion are not going away - ever. Once the atmosphere hits that test-tube, all bets are off. That is why for every 1,000 conditions achievable in the laboratory, there is only one or two that can handle being exposed to the elements of reality.

In 2009, America is exposed to reality - big time. We can grow up, pull our pants up, roll up our sleeves and compete...put aside nonsensical discussions about bygone ideas of race, faith and sexuality and focus on the century we are actually LIVING IN...

Or not.

There is no rule that dictates American primacy in the World, any more than there is one that says the Yankees will always win. America's rivals want that role for themselves, just as the Yankees rivals do, and even those who deem America the leader, want her humbled and contrite, working as a partner not an overseer. The only way for America to overcome these obstacles, is to have the BEST PLAYERS and to do THAT, we need to get smart, get real, get humble.

If you understand this place, you understand how difficult that is going to be.

Obama has shown that he is smart AND humble, that's the start we need.

But he and his team are up against it, due to conditions we've just discussed. No American President has ever had less room for error than Obama. And that is why his Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner, choosing to chastise the Chinese on DAY ONE of his term is the sort of mistake America cannot allow. Already, in the immediate aftermath of the comments, the Chinese have adopted a belligerent tone not heard throughout the crisis previously and cozied up to the Russians, who they previously had kept at arm's length.

Step ONE in this crisis, more than the stimulus battle, which while begun, will take many forms and many fights in the coming years (the voting in Congress is the BEGINNING, not the end), is to shore up America's place in the World by taking an HONEST and REAL appraisal of the circumstances. China is not to blame for the crisis we find ourselves in, any more than Steinbrenner is responsible for the plight
of the Pittsburgh Pirates.

In FACT, the Chinese have behaved with extraordinary grace and reticence thus far, OUR crisis has harmed them - our largest creditor, and done so not only by slowing business conditions but through the very types of Structured-finance products that the Bush administration arrogantly PUSHED on the Chinese during the past eight years as a necessity. Instead of saying 'we told you so', they have said 'show us you are solid and sincere about partnership' - all the more reason N-O-T to begin a new economic regime parroting the SAME misdirection towards them that the Bushes used.

Big mistake for Geithner and critical for us that Obama 'gets' that and is prepared to speak to the Chinese, the Japanese, India, Latin America and the EU directly. Each of those spheres are still disposed to working with America and perceives their own prosperity as being linked to our restoration - not to dominance, but to functionality. Islam and Russia do NOT wish this and do NOT intend to work with us, in fact - quite the opposite, they intend to do whatever they are able to obstruct us. We can survive this ONLY with a solid alliance with these other Global players and cannot afford the 'on-the-job training' miscues the Treasury Secretary began with.

On the other hand, like the Country - he can only go UP from there!

See you tomorrow.